Is Michelle Obama showing too much skin?

Is there any hope for the U.S. media, or Canada's for that matter? This story is on the front page of the Toronto Star. (online version). Is there any hope for countries that, in the midst of several wars, and the worst economic crisis since the 1920's, deem this newsworthy. There is no hope. Even if Michelle was wearing short shorts, which she is not, this is not newsworthy. The media is sick. Is Peacenik sick for getting sucked into posting this story?

First lady pushes envelope with thigh-baring outfit

DANA FELTHAUSER/AP PHOTO

Aug 21, 2009 04:30 AM

Lisa Orkin Emmanuel
ASSOCIATED PRESS

Michelle Obama has firmly established her sartorial right to bare arms. But baring thighs may be another matter.

Photographs of the first lady descending the steps of Air Force One in shorts have the media in a sweat. Some are saying Michelle Obama, on her way to the Grand Canyon for a family vacation, may have revealed too much skin.

Obama is no stranger to public scrutiny over her fashion choices, such as exposing her bare arms or wearing expensive sneakers to a soup kitchen. When Huffington Post style editor Anya Strzemien saw Obama's shorts, she knew there would be interest.

Read on...

BigAg Ticked at Michelle Obama's Organic Garden

Michelle Obama's decision to make her new White House vegetable garden entirely organic has angered America's powerful agribusiness lobby who are urging the First Lady to consider the use of appropriate "crop protection products".

Mrs Obama started work on the kitchen garden with a gang of schoolchildren last month. Media coverage of the first White House food plot since Eleanor Roosevelt "dug for victory" in the Second World War garnered media coverage across the world.


But to the consernation of Big Ag, Mrs Obama has said the project will not use chemical products to tackle pests or give her plants a boost, the Times reports.

Shortly after the digging began, Mrs Obama received a letter from the Mid-America CropLife Association (MACA), which represents the companies producing the pesticides and fertilisers underpinning "conventional" American agriculture, the paper said.

Read on...

Ferchrissakes. Peacenik's outrage meter just blew a gasket. This is like the former BIG 3 automakers lobbying against CAFE standards and negotiating tax rebates for purchasers of Hummers. The Big 3 were doing this while they were functionally bankrupt. The Big 3 is still lobbying against CAFE standards just days before they head for Chapter 11.

BigAg is in the same boat. Its business model is defunct. BigAg is destroying the world, and defending its handiwork. BigAg depends on oil. Fertilizers depend on oil. Oil is running out quickly. But BigAg is ticked about a dinky organic garden. BigAg is about to become NoAg. Peacenik says again: if you have a patch of ground, grow something you can eat.