Showing posts with label Globe and Mail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Globe and Mail. Show all posts

10/7/10

Salutin gone, punditman boycotts

punditman says...It could be said that young Punditman began his media monitoring and citizenship development by reading his Dad's Globe and Mail. Granted, young punditman started by checking NHL scores and standings in the paper's sports section, but, hey, every media critique has to start somewhere.

Sadly, punditman's decades-old Globe and Mail buying and reading spree has come to an abrupt end. Since finding out that they "fired" left-leaning and thought-provoking columnist, Rick Salutin, punditman now officially refuses to buy their rag.

"Fired"? What for? It can't simply be that the old warhorse didn't suit the paper's redesign and new look (arrghh, it's ugly!). After all, there are plenty of other oldsters still on G&M staff who could just as easily be put out to pasture (think Wente here, who, when she steps outside her comfort zone of whiny personal tales, irritates even the most jaded corporate media monitor). Whatever you think of any particular column she writes, it will almost always escape the label of being "too intellectual."

And isn't that just what the corporatist media moguls and their elitist overseers want? Don't think. Don't question. Don't ask deep questions about Harper's ideology or the expansionist/occupier/oppressor role that Israel has towards the Palestinians or the Rob Ford mayoralty candidacy, all of which Salutin did with great insight. Though he could be considered part of what Bruce Cockburn once labeled the "non-specific left," Salutin is not the Stalinist ideologue that his dim-witted critics claim. Far from it, he  is something much more threatening: an independent thinker. Part of a dying breed.

To add insult to injury, Salutin's employer  of twenty years cut the last paragraph of his last column, about the Rob Ford phenomenon, apparently because the paper doesn't allow "audience farewells." How petty. How mean. How very Harperesque. Fortunately, the complete column can be read at rabble, over here.

Why was Rick Salutin fired? Punditman says boycott the Globe and Mail now. Punditman says Rick Salutin is a great Canadian.

5/29/09

War Crimes perpetrated under Democratic and Republican administrations: George Bush versus Bill Clinton

The Rule of International Criminal Law
by Prof. Anthony J. Hall

From Calgary to Toronto

Just as fresh revelations keep oozing out about the broad extent of the international criminality perpetrated by the regime of the former US president, Canada is becoming the main site of a corporate-driven effort to re-brand George W. Bush as a legitimate political pundit. On May 29 Mr. Bush joins Bill Clinton on the stage of the Metropolitan Toronto Convention Centre in an event hosted by the TD Financial Group and several other sponsors. The hosts include the Calgary-based Bennett Jones law firm, the global accounting giant Ernst and Young, the Toronto Board of Trade as well as the Toronto-based Globe and Mail newspaper.

The Clinton-Bush gig in Canada's biggest metropolis is happening about a month after the former president "tested the waters" as a public speaker by addressing an audience of 1,400 executives of mostly Texas-based oil conglomerates in an event hosted by Calgary's Chamber of Commerce. Bush's luncheon address was accompanied by the protests of several hundred demonstrators who advanced the case that there is a huge body of evidence already in the public domain that should be sufficient to prohibit Bush from entering Canada or, failing that, to necessitate his arrest on Canadian soil. In a widely published article, which I introduced in early March at an invited lecture at the University of Winnipeg, I outlined the legal and political terrain underlying Bush's first major public foray outside the United States. That paper, which has proliferated widely on many Internet sites, is entitled "Bush League Justice: Should George W. Bush Be Arrested in Calgary Alberta and Tried for International Crimes."

My academic intervention was one part of a larger collective effort aimed at advancing the case that the international crimes of George W. Bush and many of his ministers and advisers have been so obvious and gigantic that citizens must mobilize globally to insist that the rule of international criminal law should be made to prevail over the rule of force and political expediency. Many of the core legal principles awaiting enforcement are those that coalesced in the course of the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal. Its chief prosecutor, the renowned US jurist Robert Jackson, initiated the proceedings in 1945 by insisting that humanity's future depended on removing "immunity for practically everyone concerned in the really great crimes against peace and mankind." No longer could "so vast an area of legal irresponsibility" be "tolerated" because "because modern civilization puts unlimited weapons of destruction in the hands of men."

Keep Reading...

Punditman says...Punditman just bought the Globe and Mail. Punditman had a discussion recently with someone who works at the Globe and Mail. This took place late one night at a watering hole so there was truth serum involved—all the better to discover what this Globster really thinks. Glory be, low and behold, he and Punditman had an argument about the media! The Globster thought Noam Chomsky's analysis of mass media bias was wrong and saw no nefarious influence by media ownership over media content. Punditman was amazed at this dude's utter dismissal of someone who in 2005, was voted the world’s No 1. living intellectual.

Punditman wonders what the Globster would say about the above article, and in particular the following passage:

The role of corporate media as enablers and sugar coaters of the highest order of international crime could not be made clearer than in the sponsorship by the Globe and Mail of the Toronto encounter between Clinton and Bush. What credibility does the Globe and Mail retain after the Toronto event in its coverage of the fast breaking story of the global movement to enforce the rule of law on credibly accused war criminal George W. Bush? How likely is it that the journalists at the Globe and Mail will report fairly and objectively on the intervention of Lawyers Against War.
Perhaps there will be more people showing up than Punditman anticipates at today's protest in Toronto? Punditman sure does hope so, and he has a request of anyone reading this who is going to the protest: throw some old shoes in the direction of the Metro Convention Centre, on behalf of Punditman.

Punditman just bought the Globe and Mail. Was that wrong?